peer-review plugins

by poemswe

PhD-level research capabilities: literature review, multi-source investigation, critical analysis, hypothesis-driven exploration, quantitative/qualitative methods, peer review, ethics review, and grant writing

by Seyed Yahya Shirazi

Academic manuscript toolkit: literature review (multi-phase citation-traceable + single-pass thematic), peer review, writing, journal-specific formatting with semantic-line-break safety, and humanizer pass to remove AI-writing tells

by se-uhd

Detect hallucinated (fabricated) references in academic paper PDF files: extract references, verify against offline DBLP + CrossRef, DOI resolution, arXiv and Semantic Scholar, then triage the residue via web search and report likely-hallucinated citations.

by Matt Corbett

Regenerates a review-ready report (HTML or Office/Word→PDF) from an old distributed report used as a template — infers the template's structure with no markup, re-binds it to new data (including Power BI data via XMLA, with a REST executeQueries fallback, and an embedded Power BI screenshot), and runs a gold-standard auto-QA gate: data accuracy vs source, template fidelity, WCAG/PDF-UA accessibility, consistency, and a blocking no-old-client-data-leak egress scan. It GUARANTEES only (a) no old-client-data leak and (b) that every low-confidence classification is surfaced for human review — it produces a draft; peer review, edits, and distribution stay with the human. Local-only for sensitive client data. Skills ship per lane (v0.1.0 HTML → v0.2.0 Office → v0.3.0 Power-BI-ingest); counts reconciled at Gate 12 PR time. Requires ravenclaude-core@>=0.204.0.

by Academic Writing Assistant contributors

A fidelity-first academic writing Skill for Chinese and English research papers.

by pengkangzhen

A full-lifecycle research pipeline for OR & ML, 10 skills + 1 subagent take a project from prior-art survey to the conference talk — Zotero literature intake, structured reading notes, publication-grade figures, LaTeX polishing, noun-term jargon auditing, citation verification against official APIs, three-blind adversarial review, and point-by-point rebuttal. The survey-first discipline applies to any non-trivial task, not just papers.

by skymanbp

Scientific paper writing, source-traced review, and de-AI rewriting for top-tier journals (ApJ/MNRAS/PRD/JCAP-class) and NSF/NIH proposals. Ships 12 skills and 40 tools under one typed standard: scientific-integrity blockers that cannot be waived as style preferences, a zero-target L0 lexicon, ranked advisories, explicit measurement states so missing calibration never reads as clean, claim-first rewriting gated on hard scientific-fidelity eligibility, a mechanical length budget with a machine-built removal map and a required-shrink gate, corpus-calibrated salience-hierarchy, domain-register (with an exhaustive zero-hit vocabulary audit), collocation, and discourse-texture (given/new cohesion, epistemic hedging) axes, each judged against the field's own per-section distribution at the unit it was calibrated at, a residue axis that gates the trace an edit leaves, A-R review with narrative-spine and adversarial-escalation dimensions, registry-verified bibliographies (CrossRef, DataCite, arXiv), pixel-measured figure review, and isolated multi-reviewer orchestration. Learned scores are field-similarity triage, never an authorship verdict. See CHANGELOG.md for per-version history.

by BTCH Uro AI Lab

Medical research methodology framework — 20 skills with selective constraints covering the full research pipeline. Supports clinical, basic science, AI/ML, qualitative, and survey research design. 240 journal templates, 47 reporting standards (CONSORT 2025, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD+AI, DECIDE-AI, IDEAL), 7 commands, PubMed MCP integration, one-click .docx export.

by Mingyang Bao

Academic research toolchain — systematic literature review, manuscript peer review, and IEEE reviewer discovery, backed by a single deterministic Python library and an accumulating local scholarly database.

by JP

General-purpose agent skills for the work around the work: session continuity, structured analysis, guide authoring, cross-LLM peer review, and the specification and release-planning documents that sit between an idea and a tag. Use when wrapping or resuming a coding session, turning raw thinking into a decision-ready brief, generating a guide bundle, getting a second-model review of a document, writing a feature spec, managing a version-scoped release plan, or scaffolding agent infrastructure into a repository.

by Evidence Lab

Literature synthesis, evidence-bounded academic writing, editable research diagrams, and manuscript review without installing study-design procedures.