review plugins

by Alister Lewis-Bowen

Common workflow skills for Claude Code sessions: promote changes through the full release cycle, audit Claude Code plugins/skills/agents, audit project standards compliance, analyse projects for improvements, triage open GitHub issues, and review pull requests

by Alister Lewis-Bowen

Common workflow skills for Claude Code sessions: promote changes through the full release cycle, audit Claude Code plugins/skills/agents, audit project standards compliance, analyse projects for improvements, triage open GitHub issues, and review pull requests

by schuettc

External reviewer for feature plans and implementations. Posts reviews directly on GitHub PRs via gh CLI.

by u1

Generate reviewable HTML documents, serve previews, collect comments, and feed review outcomes back into agent workflows.

by Lev Nikolaevich

Independent plan and delivery reviews with evidence-based verdicts.

by Adobe

Self-review skill for Adobe Commerce App Builder apps before submitting to Adobe Exchange.

by Daniel Radman

Turn feature requests into review-ready pull requests: issue, implementation, tests, a review-and-fix loop, and docs. Runs locally or on GitHub Actions, and is built for complex brownfield repos. Each week its retrospective reads what you actually merged and proposes improvements to your skill extensions.

by forsonny

100-question deep discovery process: a structured self-interrogation framework for thoroughly exploring a topic, architecture, strategy, or problem space before committing to a design.

by DevBrother

DevBrother agent skills for clarifying requirements, generating AGENTS.md governance systems, verifying-then-applying PR review feedback, consulting a stronger advisor model at decision points, and designing polished self-contained HTML deliverables.

by Baris Taze

Software Design and Architecture Guidelines with lens-based review skills and Python scaffolding skills

by Katie Parrott

A focused kit of feedback-first writing review skills for stress-testing drafts, arguments, pacing, clarity, and line-level prose.

by Subtext

Review Subtext session recordings and manage privacy rules

by Kevin Dutra

Review markdown documents with an interactive TUI. Leave inline comments, then let Claude address the feedback automatically.

by masuP9

Accessibility specialist skills for WCAG review, conformance auditing, and improvement planning in Codex and Claude Code.

by Seyed Yahya Shirazi

Complete grant proposal toolkit: NIH/NSF and SBIR/STTR proposal writing, merit and readability review, and figure quality assurance

by leogallego

Answer Ansible questions and review Ansible code using official documentation from the Ansible ecosystem. Covers ansible-core, ansible-lint, ansible-navigator, ansible-builder, ansible-creator, and molecule. Use when the user asks about Ansible concepts, syntax, best practices, deprecations, or wants Ansible code reviewed against official docs. Use when user says "check my playbook against docs", "what does Ansible say about X", "how do I use module Y", or "review my role". Do NOT use for CoP good practices review (use ansible-good-practices instead). Do NOT use for general Python or YAML questions unrelated to Ansible.

by leogallego

Review Ansible code against Red Hat CoP automation good practices. Use when the user wants to audit, lint, review, check, or validate Ansible roles, playbooks, collections, or inventory for compliance with CoP rules. Optionally validates module parameters via ansible-know MCP. Use when user says "lint my role", "check my playbook", "review best practices", or "audit my Ansible code". Do NOT use for general Python or YAML linting unrelated to Ansible. Do NOT use for answering Ansible module usage questions or checking syntax against official Ansible documentation (use ansible-docs instead).

by leogallego

Display the Zen of Ansible principles and review Ansible code against them. Use when the user wants to see the Zen of Ansible, get philosophical guidance on their automation approach, or review code for simplicity, readability, and clarity. Use when user says "zen of ansible", "simplify my playbook", "is this too complex", or "clean code review". Do NOT use for strict rule compliance (use ansible-good-practices instead). Do NOT use for Ansible module reference or documentation lookups (use ansible-docs instead).

by Maksim Kochetkov

Codex-native workflows for agents, conventions, project rules, reviews, and teams.

by Maksim Kochetkov

Codex-native workflows for agents, conventions, project rules, reviews, and teams.

by Alberto Leal

Review and improve engineering Markdown designs, analyses, implementation plans, and ADRs. Measure sections and protected content with a Markdown parser; optionally use Jev for typed quality and meaning-preservation judgments. Preserve requirements, uncertainty, code, and links while the agent makes targeted edits. Jev is optional and provider configurable.

by Alberto Leal

Consult Jev for bounded typed second opinions during agent work: compare plans, check claims against supplied evidence, prioritize investigations, and challenge conclusions. Uses Vercel AI Gateway by default with configurable providers; skips when the selected key is absent. Includes a standalone uv-run helper and offline contract tests.

by Alberto Leal

Review and ensure skills maintain high quality standards. Use when creating new skills, updating existing skills, or auditing skill quality. Checks for progressive disclosure, mental model shift, appropriate scope, and documentation clarity.

by alexknowshtml

Run a Socratic teaching loop that quizzes you on a coding session until you've confirmed mastery of every concept. Use when you want to learn or lock in a Claude Code session, understand a transcript/PR/design decision, be quizzed on recent work, or prepare to teach someone else — or when the user runs `/teach` or asks to be taught or quizzed on a topic. Sources sessions from ~/.claude/projects/ and tracks a per-concept checklist until every item is confirmed.