report-analyst

Surface anything genuinely interesting in a report — original ideas, noteworthy statistics, strong opinions — or confirm there's nothing worth flagging. Use when the user wants a signal-finder pass without committing to a full read or extraction.

Full critical analysis of a report — read/skim/skip verdict, opinionated executive summary, quantitative analysis, case-study deep dive, key quotes, synthesis, and metadata. Use when the user wants the complete report-analyst treatment in one bundle, saved to disk.

Generate a critical executive summary of a report — bottom-line findings plus an evaluation of credibility, originality, and methodology. Use when the user wants a one-page brief that doubles as a skeptical review, not a polite recap.

Render a markdown report-analyst output to a styled PDF via Typst (preferred) or pandoc (fallback). Use when the user wants the analysis bundle as a shareable document rather than raw markdown.

Pull case studies from a report and group them by what they demonstrate. Use when the user wants the report's examples extracted as a reference, including company/entity context, the point each case supports, and significant quotes.

Pull memorable, citable passages from a report — soundbites, well-summarised key issues, sharp findings worth quoting on social media or in further writing. Use when the user wants pull-quotes rather than analysis.

Pull the report's main arguments — core thesis, supporting arguments, evidence strength, counterarguments — into a structured table. Use when the user wants to quickly understand what the authors are trying to prove and how convincingly.

Pull only the unexpected, contradictory, or paradigm-shifting findings from a report — skipping confirmatory and well-known results. Use when the user wants the surprises rather than the executive summary.

Pull every meaningful statistic from a report and group them thematically with page references. Flags unsourced or repackaged stats. Use when the user wants the report's quantitative spine extracted as a reference table, not a summary.

Normalise a report file (PDF, DOCX, HTML, large markdown) into Claude-readable text with page anchors preserved. Use as the input adapter for the other report-analyst skills when the user passes a path on disk rather than pasted text.

Assess whether a report contains genuinely original thinking or is just regurgitated content. Use when the user suspects a report is filler / restated common knowledge and wants confirmation, with the truly-original claims (if any) ranked separately from the rest.

Quick READ / SKIM / SKIP verdict on a long report — does it justify the reader's time? Use when the user has a report (PDF, DOCX, MD) and wants a fast filter before committing to read it. Output is a verdict, a 1-5 rating across originality and length-justification, and a short rationale.