Agent Plugins Marketplace

Recently added

Plugins grouped by the day they were added to the directory, newest first.

Sep 21, 2026

  1. TradingView MCP server for market prices, screeners, sentiment, backtesting, and technical analysis.

    Codex1 MCP server
  2. Build and verify Bank of Korea report pages from DOCX and Excel source data.

    Codex11 skills
  3. Marinade Validator Bonds: SAM auction, settlement types, PSR, bond lifecycle, and ecosystem map.

    CodexClaude Code4 skills
  4. pro-gate0stars

    Run the final, deepest pull request review through the account's selected Pro reasoning model, then route confirmed findings to the best available fixer.

    Claude Code1 skill
  5. 목적별로 범위를 좁힌 읽기전용 감사자 6종. 고칠 도구를 갖고 있지 않아 발견과 수정이 구조적으로 분리됩니다.

    Claude Code
  6. 长篇网文创作系统(skills + agents + data chain + RAG)

    Claude Code8 skills
  7. vue-lsp1stars

    Vue language server (Volar) for .vue file intelligence

    Claude Code
  8. syafiqkit1stars

    Personal workflow toolkit - commits, summaries, docs, invoicing, journals

    Claude Code34 skills
  9. Optional using-loom-workflow discovery routing and Loom workflow tools around the loom stations — persistent Outcome Maps, git memory, loom-memory (recall / record / reconcile / retire durable repository lessons), critique (proposal | complexity), recap, handoff, session distill, chat visualizations (tables / ASCII / Mermaid, reasoning pages), cross-executor second opinion, plus the standalone goal-create and dbt-model-style skills.

    CodexClaude Code12 skills
  10. Optional using-loom-design discovery routing and two stations — capture-intent, write-spec — turn a rough idea into a confirmed intent and a risk-declared spec, route non-blocking second-vendor suggestions, and provide product-principles and design-system tools. Reads loom-code's contract package. Claude Code, Codex + Antigravity CLI.

    CodexClaude Code5 skills
  11. loom-code0stars

    Optional using-loom-code discovery routing and five stations carry one change from plan to PR with non-blocking cross-vendor suggestions, content-bound verification, one closing review, and a fast publication gate. Claude Code, Codex + Antigravity CLI.

    CodexClaude Code7 skills
  12. anyknow0stars

    Private personal knowledge with confirmed changes, search, browsing, and portable export.

    CodexClaude Code1 skill
  13. anycase0stars

    Canadian Immigration Intelligence & Practical Tools: Federal Court precedents, IRCC policy & Q&A, and CLB statutory calculators.

    CodexClaude Code1 skill
  14. once0stars

    Adds Once execution-safety tools for consequential AI-agent writes, ambiguous outcomes and safe retries.

    Claude Code1 MCP server
  15. frameo0stars

    Frameo turns a GitHub repository into a 30-second launch video built from its real, running UI. Clones and deeply analyzes the codebase, runs the app, explores it in a browser, analyzes the UI/UX, builds a verified Product DNA and storyboard, and hands a UI-aware composition to Hyperframes for rendering. One command: /frameo <repo-url> → a 30-second video.

    Claude Code1 skill1 MCP server
  16. code-buddy41stars

    Drive Code Buddy, the multi-provider AI coding agent (64 providers, local Ollama at $0), from Claude Code: the skill teaches headless one-shot runs, provider/model pinning, permission modes and the verify loop; the MCP server exposes Code Buddy's read-only tools. Requires `npm i -g @phuetz/code-buddy`.

    Claude Code1 skill1 MCP server
  17. Join a Landfall war room as a live investigator and expose its incident MCP tools (join_war_room, get_brief, get_updates, read_timeline, search_context, post_finding, post_widget, propose_action, record_activity, note) over stdio. Ships the landfall-investigation-dashboard agent, which recognizes a war-room join prompt on sight and specializes in maintaining the investigation's dashboard widgets.

    Claude Code1 MCP server
  18. lorenzini16stars

    Three Claude Code skills that wait for a third-party pull-request reviewer and adjudicate whether its verdict actually means pass. They do not review code; they decide what the reviewer said about it.

    CodexClaude CodeAgent Plugins1 skill
  19. Run the spec-kit phases as isolated claude processes — one model, effort level, tool allowance and turn ceiling per phase — and drive roadmaps of specs that ship in order.

    Claude Code
  20. drogon1stars

    Drogon C++ 后端开发规则与技能: 基于 Drogon 框架编写正确的异步代码, 避开回调/事件循环等高频陷阱。适用于 Claude Code、ZCode、Codex、Cursor、VS Code (Copilot)、Gemini CLI 等 coding agent。

    CodexClaude Code22 skills
  21. Speaks as the Genshin Impact character whose birthday is nearest to today: an answer opens with one spoken line in the character's voice and the rest is plain, a joke or a hello is spoken whole, and every line is read aloud in the character's own cloned voice as the reply is written.

    Claude Code15 skills
  22. Third-party skills enhanced with advisory TypeSafe Jev judgments: two-axis code review, prose humanizing (en/zh-TW), reply checking, simplification gating, and design-tree grilling, plus a procedure for migrating further skills.

    Claude Code7 skills
  23. setup0stars

    为 Claude Code 或 Codex 初始化项目级 agent 工作流,并支持可选的用户级安装

    CodexClaude CodeAgent Plugins6 skills
  24. 可从 Claude Code 或 Codex 执行的用户级初始化,当前提供 Codex 的 Claude 配置预检能力

    CodexClaude CodeAgent Plugins1 skill
  25. git0stars

    Git 提交规范与 GitHub Issue、PR 检索 workflows. Includes 2 skills.

    CodexClaude CodeAgent Plugins2 skills
  26. dev0stars

    开发流程 skills:讨论、文档、执行与优化. Includes 5 skills.

    CodexClaude CodeAgent Plugins5 skills
  27. ai0stars

    AI agent 与 skill 编写规范. Includes 1 skill.

    CodexClaude CodeAgent Plugins1 skill
  28. naswerks1stars

    The engineering loop: a knowledge loop (docs-*) and an execution loop (spec-*) for repositories driven by hosted agent sessions, plus init to make a repository ready for both.

    Claude Code13 skills
  29. PowerWorld Simulator automation knowledge: esapp, SimAuto, PWW weather data, timestep simulation, contingency analysis, and the failure modes PowerWorld reports as success.

    Claude CodeAgent Plugins2 skills
  30. Minimal engineering policy for Codex that proactively uses native delegation and context isolation while automatically managing durable state, verification, and review topology.

    CodexClaude CodeAgent Plugins2 skills
  31. mav5stars

    The MAV skill, plus one hook that tells an agent when the call it just made had a cheaper form.

    Claude Code1 skill
  32. GeekMagic SmallTV (SD_RU/SDPro ESP8266 or SmallTV Ultra, auto-detected) as a Claude Code status monitor — renders model/context/tokens to the device via hooks. IP via AGENT_GLANCE_IP env var.

    CodexClaude Code6 skills
  33. origami0stars

    Variable-resolution context: folds bulky stale tool output to disk behind always-visible stubs; hydrate() recovers detail on demand.

    Claude Code2 skills
  34. doordash0stars

    DoorDash search, menus, carts, pricing, and browser checkout handoff via the dd-cli bridge. Cannot place an order.

    Claude Code1 MCP server
  35. Skill Evolution Engine — Darwin-style autonomous SKILL.md optimizer. Applies a 9-dimension rubric (60 structural + 40 effectiveness; structure now elevates the three SkillLens-validated high-signal dimensions — failure-mechanism encoding / executable specificity / high-risk-action blacklist — that lift pairwise judge accuracy 46.4%→73.8%), default multi-judge independent scoring, mandatory with-skill-vs-no-skill baseline comparison (negative-transfer is a hard non-ship gate), and git-backed ratchet hill-climbing (keep-or-revert) to evolve any Claude Code skill from initial draft toward 90+. Ports SkillOpt's three stability controls: rejected-edit buffer (dead-ends.md) + slow-update memory (learnings.md) + text learning-rate (≤30-line edit budget). Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch, alchaincyf/darwin-skill, and Microsoft SkillLens/SkillOpt.

    Claude Code1 skill
  36. ratchet2stars

    Ratchet — Goal-driven multi-agent persistent optimization system. Combines Goal-Driven master/subagent separation with AutoResearch signal design methodology. Implements an 'independent evaluation + kill-and-restart + ratchet progress' autonomous loop: master only judges, subagent only executes; if a subagent stalls or claims success without meeting acceptance criteria, it is killed and replaced. Suitable for long-running autonomous coding tasks that require verifiable deliverables and explicit termination conditions.

    Claude Code1 skill
  37. Persona Distillation Ecosystem — a parameterized schema library + generation/evaluation/scheduling/debate toolkit for distilling personas (people or rule systems) into self-contained Claude Code skills. 5 skills, 9 persona schemas, 19 reusable components (incl. execution-profile via Klein-RPD/CDM 4-sweep), 9-phase pipeline with v0.4.0 security hardening (consent attestation, untrusted-corpus discipline, fingerprint verification, self-containment linter, rubric config lock, corpus access declaration).

    Claude Code5 skills
  38. pdforge2stars

    Product Development Forge - AI-driven 7-phase product development workflow. Provides complete methodology from requirements analysis to deployment, including brainstorming, TDD, three-stage review, and auto-fix loops.

    Claude Code7 skills
  39. looper2stars

    Looper — a system's design contract in both directions: forward-author the product world from a raw idea, or reverse-engineer it from existing code and failure memory. `/psl` turns one experiential / semantically-fuzzy requirement (plus optional materials) into a complete Product Specification Language document — six derivation-ordered layers (Vision / Mental Model / Domain Model that must overturn the naive schema / State Machine / Workflow split into Σ facts + φ disambiguation criteria, never Step 1-2-3 / behavioral Acceptance in ask-X-get-Y form) — under a three-provenance honesty discipline (surface engine world knowledge / elicit private load-bearing slots one topic at a time with recommended lettered answers / seam everything unanswerable into Open Questions, never default-fill), a dual-track entry gate (deterministic requirements get told 'PRD suffices' instead of a fabricated world), and a hard delivery contract (never refuses for lack of info), mechanically pre-gated by verify_psl.py (rejects missing layers, named-step Workflow, non-behavioral Acceptance, absent Open Questions). `/dos-extract` deductively recovers a Design Ontology Spec (DOS): a 13-section, two-layer dos.yaml (a core model of ≤7 objects / relationships / constitutional rules / bounded contexts / agent guidelines, plus a complete `vocabulary` — every other term the team says, with kind / owner / synonyms / rejected names — whose coverage verify_dos.py --terms measures against the counted roster) + decisions.md audit trail, applying four classification judgments (object vs UI vs impl vs rule; same-object-vs-two; constitution vs policy; single vs multi context) that a naive noun-scan skips, with a mechanical pre-gate (verify_dos.py rejects UI/impl-suffixed names, undeclared relationship refs, >7 objects, a missing vocabulary layer, unplaced roster terms, empty open_questions) plus a human sign-off seam. `/invariant-extract` abductively recovers ONE Territory's □-class resident invariants from the failures it paid for (a violation is the most reliable signal an invariant exists) and deductively from code execution points, emitting a named-field invariant card (statement / strength / aspect / channel / provenance / on_violation) gated by verify_card.py (rejects no-provenance entries, auto-installed hard invariants, ◊ smuggled onto the card) — hard invariants are propose-only, entering only by human signature. psl and dos-extract are reverse twins (idea→world vs code→world) sharing one domain vocabulary; invariant-extract draws a single block's resident law from its scars and consumes dos-extract's dos.yaml. All static_only tier (structurally gated; effectiveness on held-out tasks unverified).

    Claude Code2 skills
  40. humanize2stars

    Humanize — make AI-written technical prose read like a competent human professional wrote it, at the level where readers actually get lost: discourse, not vocabulary. Three skills. `/humanize` rewrites a draft (zh/en) without changing a single fact: it targets the mechanisms behind 'every word is clear but I can't follow' — given-new inversion, broken topic strings, stress-position leakage (participle / 以实现… tails), lists replacing argument, cross-section restatement, stance flattening, generic openings, summary closers — plus the solved lexical/syntax/format layer (Wikipedia 'Signs of AI writing' + 2026 density-era tics: mannered prose, invented jargon, 'not X, it's Y') and Chinese translationese (yage.ai four classes + 余光中 欧化 catalog, CCL-2023 corpus-backed). Three non-skippable gates: humanlint.py (23 surface metrics, zh/en, 0-100 AI-flavor index, calibrated on four fixtures: AI 60/63 vs human 2/0), factdiff.py (numbers / dates / identifiers / URLs / paths zero add-or-drop, plus certainty-drift warning per Belem 2026), and a context-isolated cold-reader agent that records per paragraph where a reader who never saw the brief loses the thread (expected / got / lost_at / told_not_shown) — never self-graded in the drafting context (self-refine amplifies self-bias); verify_coldread.py recomputes the reader's verdict from its five declared rules and enforces the 2-round cap mechanically (v0.2.0). Max 2 revision rounds, then deliver with the residual named. Genre decides whether structure may move (v0.3.0): proposal / design / adr / memo may be reorganised; report / readme / reference run with --keep-structure, where structdiff.py rejects any change to the heading-level sequence, list blocks and item counts, table shapes or code blocks — only the sentences inside prose paragraphs change; humanlint gained a matching `report` threshold tier. `/techdoc` writes a proposal / design doc / ADR / postmortem / memo from a brief in the shape senior engineers use (Google design docs, Oxide RFD, Amazon 6-pager, Nygard ADR, Shape Up, HashiCorp/Rust RFC, 阿里 安全生产): triggering incident with a number first, decision in one sentence, obvious alternatives killed with specific reasons, all consequences, rollout/rollback, open questions last — enforced as product order by verify_techdoc.py; facts only from brief/materials/domain knowledge, else [需核实]. `/voice-profile` distills the user's own 3–5 samples into an executable .humanize/voice.md (rhythm stats from humanlint, quoted sentence habits, personal 忌口表 with replacements, positive examples for completion-style few-shot — the technique with 20x measured style-match gain), gated by verify_voice.py. Ships rules/human-voice.md as an always-on contract pasteable into CLAUDE.md. Explicitly NOT for beating AI detectors (they train on humanizer output), NOT for injecting slang/emoji/typos as 'texture' (a new tell in technical register). All static_only tier: scripts smoke-tested on fixtures; behavioral delta on held-out drafts unverified.

    Claude Code3 skills
  41. Agent Teams Product Development Pipeline - 7-phase adversarial collaborative development with multi-agent debate, competition, and cross-validation at every critical decision point, including red team attacks, adversarial debugging, independent bug fix loop, and requirement verification.

    Claude Code5 skills
  42. Done_When Pipeline v1.0 — turn fuzzy natural-language requirements into machine-verifiable completion contracts, then run a multi-agent acceptance loop against an implementation. Nine skills in a two-layer topology (per HTML v2 architecture). Layer 1: TWO contract producers + SIX independently-invocable review skills — `/acceptance-spec` (NL → EARS spec + done_when.yaml with existence/behavior/rules schema + spec-robustness.md anti-gaming companion), `/test-suite-generator` (EARS → 5-layer test pyramid: existence/unit/integration/e2e/mutation; the v0.x fitness rubric layer was retired per HTML v2 §3.5 fitness-check dissolution), and six review skills each user-invocable on their own: `/code-reviewer` (diff → findings, focus-driven: security/logic/perf/style/all; Detective Loop not flowchart; 5-finding cap; cross-vendor adversarial mode), `/qa-reviewer` (actually runs tests, classifies maintenance-vs-genuine failures, emits go/no-go), `/pm-reviewer` (Agent-as-Judge: LOCATE/READ/RETRIEVE atoms; requirements normalized from EARS/Jira/Linear/PRD/issue; 4-state TicketCompliance verdict where requires_human_verification is the formal home for genuinely-unautomatable evaluation), `/spec-drift-detector` (code archaeologist: detects spec/code factual divergence without judging which is correct; git_blame traces commit_introducing_drift; 3 divergence types: timing/behavior/contract), `/spec-gaming-detector` (assumes author is gaming; 6 RHD patterns absolute + diff mode; outputs spec_robustness_gaps for contract hardening), `/meta-judge` (synthesizes findings via 4 actions: dedupe/weight/arbitrate/classify; HARD WALL — does NOT re-review code; pluggable rules source). Layer 2: `/acceptance-fleet` is pure orchestrator — dispatches the 6 review skills in parallel against an impl, hands findings to /meta-judge, decodes verdict into four-state ratchet (DONE/FIX/SPEC_DRIFT/GAMING_RISK), persists every iteration to ratchet-log/iteration-NNN/. Anti-gaming structural guarantee: implementation agents MUST NOT see evaluator prompts; minimum medium isolation (mixed Claude sizes) enforced; cross-vendor (Codex/Gemini) preferred for adversarial-reviewer and spec-gaming-detector to break the Claude-reviewing-Claude sycophancy loop per Milvus benchmark. Borrows: PR-Agent diff schema + TicketCompliance 4-state; Greptile v3 Detective Loop; Anthropic Code Review verification step + fleet-by-focus; DevAI Agent-as-Judge (LOCATE/READ/RETRIEVE); Playwright Healer maintenance-vs-genuine; Dartmouth/Yale Meta-Judge (replaces multi-agent debate); 4-Eyes Principle from finance; Weaver framework for weighted weak-verifier ensemble; Komorebi AI Specification Self-Correction. Design philosophy: verifiable beats judgeable (even for things that feel subjective); debate amplifies bias (use meta-judge synthesis, not debate); independence-by-default (each review skill works standalone — done_when.yaml is just one of its consumers).

    Claude Code1 skill
  43. Design DNA extraction + pixel-perfect website cloning. Combines programmatic CSS extraction (Browser MCP + getComputedStyle) with a 3-dimension design profile schema (design system / design style / visual effects). Two modes: --dna-only outputs a structured 150+ field Design DNA JSON; --full additionally generates a Next.js pixel-perfect clone via parallel builder agents.

    Claude Code1 skill
  44. Generate a bespoke DESIGN.md for any product brief by reverse-engineering a corpus of existing DESIGN.md design systems into a computable design grammar (rules + rationale + relationships), then forward-generating with three-part rationale (inheritance + adaptation + justification). Outputs the v1.13.0 distinctiveness kernel: concept-first seeding (POV per brief, not category centroid), anchor+productive-tension retrieval, divergent best-of-N candidate generation, a bounded transformational operator, and a 6-check P0 gate (coherence/archetype/kansei/neighbor + rationale-judge + taste-critic for distinctiveness) + OD-dialect 9-section DESIGN.md format (Visual Theme & Atmosphere / Color Palette & Roles / Typography Rules / Component Stylings / Layout Principles / Depth & Elevation / Do's and Don'ts / Responsive Behavior / Agent Prompt Guide) consumable by any DESIGN.md-compatible tool (OD, Claude Design, Stitch). Two interaction modes: interactive (one-shot question batching, max 7 questions, never interrupts mid-generation) or auto (zero-questions, default-driven inference). Self-evolving: high-frequency adaptations consolidate into new rules. Material library is decoupled — works with OD's ~140 systems, awesome-design-md, or any DESIGN.md collection.

    Claude Code1 skill
  45. ai-dlc2stars

    AI-DLC — 一条产研自闭环的软件开发流水线,做成 Claude Code 插件:世界 → 本体 → 契约 → 标准 → 计划 → 实现 → 验收 → 交付 → 学习,每一步的产物要么能被脚本检,要么被一道只能人签的门挡住,没有第三种。30 个 skill 组织成九环 + 一根脊柱(docs/ARCHITECTURE.md)。 三条主线。**上半段建世界**:/psl 把体验性需求写成六层 Product Specification Language,/psl-derive 推出 DOS 提案 / workflow / 形态草案(每条决策引用一个 PSL-ID)并用 N 次隔离推导的分歧集当 G1 议程。**下半段收敛交付**:/issue → /donewhen-extract(或 /acceptance-spec)→ G2 哈希冻结判据 → /plan-cards 切成自包含任务卡 → /implement 隔离实现 + /commit 三道闸 → /acceptance-fleet 并行派发六个审查 skill → /meta-judge 合成四态棘轮 → /pr → /review-loop(评论当待验证主张)→ /release → 归档。**横切**:/dos-extract 与 /invariant-extract 管本体与不变量,routing.yaml 管失败按层回流与分层预算,/retro 与 /tune 管度量与环参数。 设计上不肯让步的几条。**路由确定化,质量交给模型**:状态机、路由表、执行图、六个环契约全是数据,由脚本强制,引擎只提议——`aidlc_state.py advance` 对着状态检前置条件,不对着模型的说法检。**判据先于代码且冻结**:done_when.yaml v2 是唯一契约 schema,G2 签它、L5 再签一次测试,之后改锁内文件必须附变更提案。**评估者与被评估者分离**:实现者只见卡 + AC 子集 + 红基线,看不到评审判据与隐藏集。**声明了但没求值 ≠ 通过**:分析器跑不了退出 3,审查没跑完记为 unevaluated,两者都不许报绿。**失败归层不原地重试**:同指纹两次、震荡、平台期分别路由到方案层或任务层,预算耗尽写失败报告交人。**账本只增不删**:产物可回滚,判据与失败记录不回滚。**三道门只能人签**:G1 世界裁决 / G2 判据冻结 / G3 例外复核,`--autopilot` 与自治阶梯都不代签。 v1.0.0 起流程按三个正交旋钮伸缩(借鉴 AWS AI-DLC 2.0 的 scope grid,见 docs/reports/aidlc-gap-2026-09-07.md):**广度**是 sizing.yaml 的阶段网格,由 next_allowed / prereqs 强制、verify_sizing.py 九条 lint 核验,never_skippable 把三道门挡在旋钮之外,跳过要用可数的证据换、每次写一条带理由的账本行;**测试量**是下界,derive_counts.py --strategy 检,低于地板退出 4;**深度**只是声明,因为没有脚本能判「这份文档够不够细」——文档如实标注,不假装它是闸。同版新增解释日记(notes.md 四格:Interpretations / Deviations / Tradeoffs / Open questions,门禁前逐字呈现不筛选,Open questions 不晋升,晋升的规则下一次 init 才编译进去)、审查完成度闸 verify_review_complete.py、跨制品术语传感器 verify_vocabulary.py(B 档)、自治阶梯 autonomy、启动前算有效规模的 plan、装置健康度 doctor。 证据等级诚实登记:全部 skill 为 static_only —— 结构过审 + 脚本在 fixture 上冒烟(条数以 `eval/smoke.sh` 结尾行为准,不手抄;关键行为配变异证明),**带 / 不带这套纪律的行为层对照只跑过一轮十题**,且出题人与被测者同源。能说什么、不能说什么写在 docs/evaluation.md。 v1.6.0(2026-09-12)按「它是不是一条闭环」重读一遍,修了七处声明与代码不一致:逃逸缺陷有了登记入口(`aidlc_state.py escape`:计到归因层、追加 escape-defects.md、镜像进归档——此前没有任何命令写 escape 事件,复盘的逃逸率结构上永远是 0);`meets_done_when` 由 `meets_done_when.py` 比对阈值得出且不可 set(R010 从 not_enforced 变 system);`advance` 对着文件检不对着 flag 检(implement 自己跑 lint_cards.py、pr 读 final-state.json、archive 读 post-deploy 行、四个阶段重验锁);`card_retries` 按卡计不按层计;`--evidence` 先归一化再取指纹;M 档的两人审查子集只认推导来的档位;红→绿证据有了另一半(`verify_red_green.py`:消失的红测试算不绿)。同版第二遍按「没有断点」再走一次每个阶段的前置:G2 的裁决在 implement 再查(S 档跳过 cards 不跳签字)、l5 锁与红基线是 implement 的前置、红→绿证据与锁历史回放是 pr 的前置、校准报告按档编译进 acceptance、评审出口读 pr-poll 写的裁决文件、merge.sha 与 release.tag 问 git、契约有 human AC 时 G3 关不掉。冒烟主链跑在一个真的 git 仓库里。 v1.7.0(2026-09-15)把插件放进一个真实团队仓库(Electron 桌面端,自带 harness)用了一遍,修了九处「默认假设和人家的仓库对不上」:`verify_pr.py --sections` 把 PR 语义槽映射到团队自己的模板(槽键封闭集、豁免要理由且逐条 flag、issue 链接 / 验证 / AC 映射只能挪不能免);同步检查的远端与 base 由跟踪分支和 `<remote>/HEAD` 解析,多远端无跟踪时记跳过而不是去比 origin;契约新增 `constraints.test_globs`,`advance g2` 带 `--repo` 检 forbidden_paths 是否真盖住了仓库里的测试文件(就近放 `*.spec.ts` 的仓库里 `tests/**` 一条都盖不住);`verify_release.py --scheme semver|calver|external`,SemVer 不再接受前导零;`doctor` 报会话里装的插件版本是否落后、宿主里与子 skill 同名 / 近名的 skill;scope 目录不存在时说出来;`verify_agent_map.py` 核对 `file:` 来路(文件在、行号不越界、`#"原文"` 仍逐字在源文件里)。每条都有正反两面的冒烟期望和变异证明。 v1.10.0(2026-09-15,随 1.9.x 一起发)在 vana-builder 上真跑 /dos-extract 时,`inventory.py` 把 478 个 Vue 单文件组件扫成了零、把 spec 文件里的 mock 与全大写常量当成名词,而报告对此一声不吭:现在读 SFC 的 `<script>` 块,测试文件默认跳过并计数(`--include-tests`),常量进剪枝组,没有提取规则的语言按扩展名报「not scanned」。同一轮起草 agent-map 时发现 `verify_agent_map.py --probe` 会照跑一条清空本机应用数据的 E2E 命令:期望列 `no-probe: <理由>` 的行跳过并记 flag,理由必填,全套测试不许。probe 前比对 `.nvmrc` / `.node-version` 与当前 Node,不一致时出 flag 并在失败条目里提示先排除环境(vana 的 `npm test` 在 Node 25 上全挂,22.23.2 上 3147 条全过)。v1.11.0(2026-09-20)堵上「直接说冻结」这个口子:一张带未裁冲突的不变量卡,`lock_done_when.py sign` 原本照签不误、退出码 0——草稿该有的未决项被当成已定的法冻上了。现在 `verify_card.py --ready-to-sign` 把未裁的冲突 / 没人裁过的低置信条目 / 未过存活测试的条目从「草稿的未决项」升成拒并点名;`sign` 按形状认出不变量卡(有 `territory_id` + `hard_invariants`)自己去跑它,不过就拒签,`--force-unresolved --reason` 强签时把理由与未决项清单写进锁——一个没写下来的例外,和一次疏忽长得一模一样。 v1.12.0(2026-09-20)加第 30 个 skill `/ratify`:V-15 让 `sign` 拒签带未决项的卡之后,缺的是把人**带过**这段仪式的东西——用户原话「还是需要 skill 的吧?不然我怎么同意呢?我不想手打命令」。纪律:未决项由 `agenda.py` 从**文件**里逐条读出呈现(不做有趣度筛选,同 notes --for-gate)、一条一条当场裁、裁决盖姓名与日期写回、再跑一次判据、最后才签;拖延(待定 / TBD)被脚本拒——它不是坏答案而是另一个去处(进 open_questions 带负责人)。签字只有两种身份:人自己签,或**受委托签署**且把人的授权原话写进锁文件;模型以 human 身份签字是伪造签名,不是省事。 前身叫 sdlc,2026-09-08 改名;归档目录与历史报告保持原样未改写。

    Claude Code18 skills
  46. Adversarial Debugging with Agent Teams - Multiple agents investigate competing hypotheses in parallel, challenge each other's findings through structured debate, and converge on the true root cause.

    Claude Code1 skill
  47. 13 agents, 38 skills, 19 commands, 17 hooks — spec-driven, multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code with per-phase model tiers, opt-in lifecycle hooks, and optional cross-device semantic memory.

    Claude Code38 skills
  48. jev-x-kit0stars

    Offline $0 decision layer for coding agents: Choice/Score/Noul primitives, a BELKI confidence gatekeeper, ultra-planning, red-teaming, 4-channel research, lossless log compaction and RLVR self-improvement — as an MCP server + CLI + skill.

    Claude Code1 skill1 MCP server
  49. dev-kit1stars

    AI-native dev harness: 13 categories, 0-arg commands, A2A typed, Eval-Repair, Human-on-the-Loop.

    CodexClaude Code50 skills
  50. Quy trình dev React Native nhận layout từ BA (sơ đồ screen, kiểm tra Figma/HTML) và biệt đội Planner/Coder/Tester/Reviewer

    Claude Code6 skills