xbert-client-fee-review
Evidence-based annual fee review across the whole client book, with per-client drill-down.
By XBert IntelligenceLicense: MIT1 GitHub starsUpdated 2 weeks ago
Directory evidence
- Runtimes
- Claude Code
- Parsed components
- 1 skill or MCP entry
- Source updated
- Sep 9, 2026
- Manifest status
- Canonical path parsed
The directory validates manifest shape and source location. It does not execute the plugin or provide a security endorsement. Review the indexing methodology →
Install xbert-client-fee-review for Claude Code
claude plugin marketplace add IchenDEV/agent-plugin-mkt
claude plugin marketplace update agent-plugin-marketplace
claude plugin install xbert-client-fee-review@agent-plugin-marketplacePaste and run these commands in a terminal with Claude Code. They add and refresh the PluginsMP catalog, then install this plugin.
The installer fetches third-party code from the source repository shown on this page. This directory validates manifest structure and source location, but does not perform a security audit; review the manifest, components, and source before installing.
Get the source manually
git clone https://github.com/XBertIntelligence/XBert-PluginsClone the source repository, then follow its setup instructions to add the plugin to a compatible client. The plugin root is plugins/xbert-client-fee-review/.
Plugin files
├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json└── skills/client-fee-review/SKILL.md
Included Skills1
Run the XBert Client Fee Review for a Connect tenant — assemble per-client evidence (logged time, six ledger-volume categories, current fee) and categorise the book into Increase / Stable / Decrease / Insufficient-data. Use when the user asks for an annual fee review, pricing review, fee-recovery analysis, cost-to-serve, pricing standardisation, or invokes the /client-fee-review slash command. Also triggers on 'are we charging the right fee', 'which clients are underpriced', 'we need to repricing the book'.
Plugin manifests1
{
"name": "xbert-client-fee-review",
"displayName": "XBert Client Fee Review",
"description": "Evidence-based annual fee review across the whole client book, with per-client drill-down.",
"author": {
"name": "XBert Intelligence",
"email": "[email protected]"
},
"homepage": "https://intelligence.xbert.io/plugins/xbert-client-fee-review",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"pricing",
"fee-review",
"annual",
"advisory",
"cost-to-serve"
],
"x-xbert": {
"displayName": "XBert Client Fee Review",
"tagline": "Evidence-based annual fee review across the whole client book, with per-client drill-down.",
"audience": [
"principals",
"practice-managers"
],
"categories": [
"pricing",
"fee-review",
"annual",
"advisory"
],
"prerequisites": [
"XBert account",
"XPM connected (for timesheet and client data) — or equivalent practice management source",
"At least 12 months of completed work and time records for the cohort being reviewed"
],
"screenshots": [],
"demoVideo": null,
"includes": {
"skills": 1,
"commands": 1,
"mcpTools": 0
},
"longDescription": "Annual fee review is the single most-deferred conversation in a practice. It is deferred because the evidence to support it lives in five systems and assembling it for every client by hand takes a week. That assembly job is what this plugin does (cowork brief #6 — the 'hell yes, would use immediately' response from the practice-owner workshops).\n\nClient Fee Review pulls per-client time logged, transaction-volume signals from the ledger (bank transactions, AP and AR documents, payroll runs, expense claims, manual journals) and the current fee position, then produces three first-class outputs: clients where the evidence supports an increase, clients where the current fee is appropriate, and clients where a decrease is the right call. Confirmed-healthy evidence is as valuable as the change list — it lets you walk into the partner meeting knowing where the book stands.\n\nv1 produces the evidence pack. Cost-base modelling and the price-setting calculus are an integration hand-off to a dedicated pricing tool (Cass Scott Strategic Pricing is a common pairing).",
"useCases": [
{
"title": "Annual fee-review prep",
"description": "First step of the annual review: produce the per-client evidence pack and let the partners spend their time deciding, not assembling spreadsheets."
},
{
"title": "Pre-renewal pricing conversation",
"description": "Before a client engagement letter renews, walk in with the cost-to-serve evidence — time, volumes, and trend — instead of a feel-based number."
},
{
"title": "Cohort price-check",
"description": "Filter to a service-type cohort (e.g. bookkeeping-only clients) and see the dispersion of fee vs cost-to-serve to find outliers."
},
{
"title": "Pricing-tool integration",
"description": "Export the evidence pack as the input for Cass Scott Strategic Pricing (or your tool of choice) so the price-setting step starts from real data."
}
],
"benefits": [
{
"icon": "TrendingUp",
"title": "Three first-class outputs",
"description": "Increase, stable-priced and decrease lists are all produced. Confirmed-healthy is evidence too — not just the change cases."
},
{
"icon": "BarChart3",
"title": "Per-client transaction evidence",
"description": "Six ledger volume categories — bank transactions, AP, AR, payroll runs, expense claims, manual journals — paired with logged time to build cost-to-serve."
},
{
"icon": "FileText",
"title": "Per-client drill-down output",
"description": "Word document with portfolio summary, three lists, and a one-page evidence sheet per client. Excel export for downstream pricing tools."
}
],
"workflow": [
"Type /client-fee-review in Claude Code or Claude Desktop",
"Confirm scope: Connect tenant, cohort filter, review period (default = last 12 months)",
"Plugin pulls timesheets, client config and ledger volume summaries via XBert MCP",
"Per-client evidence is assembled, clients are categorised into increase / stable / decrease / insufficient-data",
"Build the working-paper payload, render via xbert-working-paper:render-docx, and report the saved path"
]
}
}For maintainers
If you maintain this plugin, link to this source-backed listing from your README so users can review its manifest and indexed components.
[xbert-client-fee-review on Agent Plugins Marketplace](https://pluginsmp.com/plugins/xbert-client-fee-review)