ponytail
v4.9.0Lazy senior dev mode. Forces the simplest, shortest solution that actually works: YAGNI, stdlib first, no unrequested abstractions.
By Dietrich GebertLicense: MIT0 GitHub starsUpdated 57 minutes ago
Directory evidence
- Runtimes
- Codex and Claude Code
- Parsed components
- 6 skill or MCP entries
- Source updated
- Sep 3, 2026
- Manifest status
- Canonical path parsed
The directory validates manifest shape and source location. It does not execute the plugin or provide a security endorsement. Review the indexing methodology →
Install ponytail for Codex and Claude Code
codex plugin marketplace add praxis-loop/plugins
codex plugin marketplace upgrade praxis-plugins
codex plugin add ponytail@praxis-pluginsPaste and run these commands in a terminal with Codex. They add and refresh the praxis-plugins catalog, then install this plugin.
Compatibility: the page URL and API slug “ponytail-2” remain stable.
- Codex:
ponytail-2@agent-plugin-marketplace→ponytail@praxis-plugins
The installer fetches third-party code from the source repository shown on this page. This directory validates manifest structure and source location, but does not perform a security audit; review the manifest, components, and source before installing.
Get the source manually
git clone https://github.com/praxis-loop/pluginsClone the source repository, then follow its setup instructions to add the plugin to a compatible client. The plugin root is plugins/ponytail/.
Plugin files
├── .codex-plugin/plugin.json├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json├── skills/ponytail/SKILL.md├── skills/ponytail-audit/SKILL.md├── skills/ponytail-debt/SKILL.md├── skills/ponytail-gain/SKILL.md├── skills/ponytail-help/SKILL.md└── skills/ponytail-review/SKILL.md
Included Skills6
Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.
Harvest every `ponytail:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals ponytail leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Use when the user says "ponytail debt", "/ponytail-debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", "ponytail ledger", or "what did we mark to do later". One-shot report, changes nothing.
Show ponytail's measured impact as a compact scoreboard: less code, less cost, more speed, from the benchmark medians. One-shot display, not a persistent mode, and not a per-repo number. Trigger: /ponytail-gain, "ponytail gain", "what does ponytail save", "show ponytail impact", "ponytail scoreboard".
Quick-reference card for all ponytail modes, skills, and commands. One-shot display, not a persistent mode. Trigger: /ponytail-help, "ponytail help", "what ponytail commands", "how do I use ponytail".
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
Plugin manifests2
{
"name": "ponytail",
"version": "4.9.0",
"description": "Lazy senior dev mode. Forces the simplest, shortest solution that actually works: YAGNI, stdlib first, no unrequested abstractions.",
"author": {
"name": "Dietrich Gebert",
"url": "https://github.com/DietrichGebert"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail",
"repository": "https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"yagni",
"minimalism",
"code-review",
"productivity"
],
"skills": "./skills/",
"hooks": "./hooks/claude-codex-hooks.json",
"interface": {
"displayName": "Ponytail",
"shortDescription": "Lazy senior developer mode",
"longDescription": "Prefer YAGNI, the standard library, native platform features, and the smallest correct implementation.",
"developerName": "Dietrich Gebert",
"category": "Productivity",
"capabilities": [
"Instructions",
"Lifecycle hooks"
],
"websiteURL": "https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail",
"defaultPrompt": [
"Use Ponytail mode for this task.",
"Review this diff for over-engineering.",
"Find the smallest correct implementation."
],
"brandColor": "#111111",
"composerIcon": "./assets/logo.png",
"logo": "./assets/logo.png"
}
}{
"name": "ponytail",
"version": "4.9.0",
"description": "Lazy senior dev mode. Forces the simplest, shortest solution that actually works: YAGNI, stdlib first, no unrequested abstractions.",
"author": {
"name": "Dietrich Gebert",
"url": "https://github.com/DietrichGebert"
},
"hooks": "./hooks/claude-codex-hooks.json"
}For maintainers
If you maintain this plugin, link to this source-backed listing from your README so users can review its manifest and indexed components.
[ponytail on Agent Plugins Marketplace](https://pluginsmp.com/plugins/ponytail-2)